Gov

General Election

ELECTION WAS NOV 3

New York CityProposal 2

City contracting

Lets a city board shorten the questionnaire businesses and nonprofits fill out for city contracts, lets the Mayor hand some large-contract approvals to agency officials, drops a yearly hearing, and requires the board to meet quarterly.

Endorsements & public statements

Who supports the proposal, who has raised concerns, and what they have said.

23 statements

Abundance New York

Abundance New York

October 16, 2026

Vote yes

“Still, it is a step in the right direction and should be enthusiastically approved.”

— Abundance New York

Their position

Recommends Yes. Says contracting will still be slow, with a median of 387 days from need to contract for competitive sealed proposals, but calls the change a step in the right direction.

CY

Common Cause New York

October 15, 2026

Vote yes

“Reducing unnecessary administrative burdens can help smaller businesses and nonprofits participate in City contracting, while regular Procurement Policy Board meetings provide an additional opportunity for oversight. Transparency and safeguards protecting public funds must remain intact.”

— Common Cause New York

JJ

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice

October 14, 2026

Vote yes

“JFREJ recommends voting yes on all five ballot measures.”

— Jews For Racial & Economic Justice

Citizens Union

Citizens Union

October 1, 2026

Vote yes

“These proposals will not overhaul the system, but they could improve it at the margins by allowing city agencies to get money out the door faster and reducing staff time dedicated to sparsely attended hearings. But there are risks. Specifically, we are concerned about the plan to give the administration, through the Procurement Policy Board, the authority to rewrite the questionnaire that new vendors must submit.”

— Citizens Union

Their position

Concerned that letting the Procurement Policy Board rewrite the vendor questionnaire could drop integrity questions, and says the Department of Investigation must be involved.

Reinvent Albany

Reinvent Albany

September 29, 2026

Vote yes

“We strongly support quarterly meeting requirements for the Procurement Policy Board, which has not met on a regular basis, even while many important contracting policies should be addressed.”

— Reinvent Albany

Their position

Recommends a strong Yes. Supports quarterly Procurement Policy Board meetings and vendor questionnaires tailored by industry.

DV

D9 Harlem Votes

October 16, 2026

Opposes proposal

“Reducing contractor paperwork should not come with reduced public review or unclear changes in oversight responsibilities.”

— D9 Harlem Votes

NI

New York Lawyers for the Public Interest

October 16, 2026

Supports proposal

Summary

Filed a statement supporting this proposal with the NYC Votes voter guide. Says it would lower barriers for prospective city contractors, especially small and grassroots nonprofits, including organizations led by and serving communities of color.

NA

New York City Democratic Socialists of America

October 16, 2026

Supports proposal

Summary

Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.

HC

Hotel and Gaming Trades Council

October 16, 2026

Supports proposal

Summary

Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.

MY

Municipal Art Society of New York

October 16, 2026

Supports proposal

“we support the land use proposals in ballot questions #1, 2, and 4”

— Municipal Art Society of New York

Their position

Supports this proposal; recommends No only on Question 3.

LY

League of Women Voters of the City of New York

September 16, 2026

Concern raised

“By eliminating criteria requirements for applicants, information may be removed that could have highlighted incompetency, corruption or poor past performance.”

— League of Women Voters of the City of New York

Their position

Lists pros and cons without recommending a vote. The cons it lists: less oversight from ending the Mayor’s sign-off on contracts over $5 million, a shorter questionnaire that could drop information revealing corruption or poor past performance, and less public data about subcontractors.

NC

New York City Council

July 24, 2026

Concern raised

“The Council is concerned by the speed and process through which the Administration advanced these Charter Revision Commission proposals”

— New York City Council spokesperson

Their position

A Council spokesperson said the commission advanced sweeping changes in weeks and that several proposals could reduce public input and weaken checks and balances. The statement covers the whole package and does not ask voters to reject any question.

Human Services Council

Human Services Council

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“Nonprofits are lifelines in communities, and can no longer operate under the status quo of antiquated processes and delayed payments and that’s why HSC is pleased to see COGE seek reforms to the Charter to simplify the procurement process and help address the chronic delays nonprofits face getting City contracts approved and paid”

— Michelle Jackson, Executive Director of the Human Services Council

Local 95 Head Start Employees

Local 95 Head Start Employees

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“When contracted Head Start providers face payment delays from the City, it leads not only to late and missing paychecks but also to the sudden closures of these facilities that New York families rely on. I'm grateful to see more streamlining of the procurement process in these ballot proposals.”

— Linda McPherson, President of Local 95 Head Start Employees

Local 205 Day Care Employees

Local 205 Day Care Employees

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“We applaud the Committee's ballot proposals to make the City's procurement and award process more efficient so that the workers who deliver these important services are no longer left in the dark about the security of their next paycheck.”

— Robert Ramos, President of Local 205 Day Care Employees

1digit

1digit

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“Addressing late payments will keep the doors to community-serving organizations open for 3m New Yorkers who depend on them and will ensure that the workforce gets paid on time so they can take care of their own families. 1digit congratulates COGE on its important procurement recommendations”

— Jennifer Geiling, President of 1digit

Their position

Supports the procurement recommendations, citing late payments to community nonprofits. The figure of 3 million New Yorkers served is 1digit’s own.

Bronx Chamber of Commerce

Bronx Chamber of Commerce

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“Bronx businesses know firsthand how valuable a more coordinated and predictable approach to permitting and City contracting can be”

— Lisa Sorin, President of the Bronx Chamber of Commerce

Win

Win

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“As the city’s largest provider of shelter for families, COGE's reforms will cut through the red tape that keep us from serving families faster, meaning we can focus on what we do best.”

— Christine C. Quinn, President & CEO of Win

Their position

Supports reducing nonprofit contracting red tape. Win describes itself as the city’s largest provider of shelter for families.

SB

Staten Island Business Outreach Center & Forest Avenue BID

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“Streamlining approvals for outdoor dining, accessibility ramps, benches, and sidewalk improvements, while modernizing City contracting, will help reduce costs, eliminate unnecessary red tape, and create greater opportunities for small businesses and nonprofit organizations.”

— Nina Flores, Executive Director of the Staten Island Business Outreach Center & Forest Avenue BID

Harlem Commonwealth Council

Harlem Commonwealth Council

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“Cutting contracting timelines from thirteen months to six returns that capital to its real purpose: building businesses, housing, and opportunity.”

— Sharon Joseph, CEO & President of Harlem Commonwealth Council

Their position

Supports faster nonprofit contracting. City Hall’s July 23 release credits the 13-to-6-month cut to internal reforms outside the Charter and estimates this proposal saves up to 30 days.

CitizensNYC

CitizensNYC

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“Faster, fairer business approvals and contracting means small businesses and community-based nonprofits spend less time navigating City Hall and more time serving their neighborhoods. We commend the Commission for listening, and we're proud to support these changes.”

— Julie Shapiro, CEO of CitizensNYC

Tech:NYC

Tech:NYC

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“We're excited to see Mayor Mamdani's Charter Revision Commission advancing practical reforms that modernize city government by reducing unnecessary bureaucracy, simplifying permitting, improving procurement, and helping government work more effectively”

— Julie Samuels, President and CEO of Tech:NYC

Vital City

Vital City

July 23, 2026

Supports proposal

“All that amounts to real improvement.”

— Vital City

Their position

Says all five proposals merit passage. On this question, calls the changes a real improvement but notes they leave out time limits for registering contracts and standards for paying vendors on time.

NYC Ballot Proposal 2 (2026): City contracting, explained | By The People