General Election
New York CityProposal 2
City contracting
Lets a city board shorten the questionnaire businesses and nonprofits fill out for city contracts, lets the Mayor hand some large-contract approvals to agency officials, drops a yearly hearing, and requires the board to meet quarterly.
Endorsements & public statements
Who supports the proposal, who has raised concerns, and what they have said.
23 statements

Abundance New York
October 16, 2026
“Still, it is a step in the right direction and should be enthusiastically approved.”
— Abundance New York
Their position
Recommends Yes. Says contracting will still be slow, with a median of 387 days from need to contract for competitive sealed proposals, but calls the change a step in the right direction.
Common Cause New York
October 15, 2026
“Reducing unnecessary administrative burdens can help smaller businesses and nonprofits participate in City contracting, while regular Procurement Policy Board meetings provide an additional opportunity for oversight. Transparency and safeguards protecting public funds must remain intact.”
— Common Cause New York
Jews For Racial & Economic Justice
October 14, 2026
“JFREJ recommends voting yes on all five ballot measures.”
— Jews For Racial & Economic Justice

Citizens Union
October 1, 2026
“These proposals will not overhaul the system, but they could improve it at the margins by allowing city agencies to get money out the door faster and reducing staff time dedicated to sparsely attended hearings. But there are risks. Specifically, we are concerned about the plan to give the administration, through the Procurement Policy Board, the authority to rewrite the questionnaire that new vendors must submit.”
— Citizens Union
Their position
Concerned that letting the Procurement Policy Board rewrite the vendor questionnaire could drop integrity questions, and says the Department of Investigation must be involved.

Reinvent Albany
September 29, 2026
“We strongly support quarterly meeting requirements for the Procurement Policy Board, which has not met on a regular basis, even while many important contracting policies should be addressed.”
— Reinvent Albany
Their position
Recommends a strong Yes. Supports quarterly Procurement Policy Board meetings and vendor questionnaires tailored by industry.
D9 Harlem Votes
October 16, 2026
“Reducing contractor paperwork should not come with reduced public review or unclear changes in oversight responsibilities.”
— D9 Harlem Votes
New York Lawyers for the Public Interest
October 16, 2026
Summary
Filed a statement supporting this proposal with the NYC Votes voter guide. Says it would lower barriers for prospective city contractors, especially small and grassroots nonprofits, including organizations led by and serving communities of color.
New York City Democratic Socialists of America
October 16, 2026
Summary
Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.
Hotel and Gaming Trades Council
October 16, 2026
Summary
Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.
Municipal Art Society of New York
October 16, 2026
“we support the land use proposals in ballot questions #1, 2, and 4”
— Municipal Art Society of New York
Their position
Supports this proposal; recommends No only on Question 3.
League of Women Voters of the City of New York
September 16, 2026
“By eliminating criteria requirements for applicants, information may be removed that could have highlighted incompetency, corruption or poor past performance.”
— League of Women Voters of the City of New York
Their position
Lists pros and cons without recommending a vote. The cons it lists: less oversight from ending the Mayor’s sign-off on contracts over $5 million, a shorter questionnaire that could drop information revealing corruption or poor past performance, and less public data about subcontractors.
New York City Council
July 24, 2026
“The Council is concerned by the speed and process through which the Administration advanced these Charter Revision Commission proposals”
— New York City Council spokesperson
Their position
A Council spokesperson said the commission advanced sweeping changes in weeks and that several proposals could reduce public input and weaken checks and balances. The statement covers the whole package and does not ask voters to reject any question.

Human Services Council
July 23, 2026
“Nonprofits are lifelines in communities, and can no longer operate under the status quo of antiquated processes and delayed payments and that’s why HSC is pleased to see COGE seek reforms to the Charter to simplify the procurement process and help address the chronic delays nonprofits face getting City contracts approved and paid”
— Michelle Jackson, Executive Director of the Human Services Council

Local 95 Head Start Employees
July 23, 2026
“When contracted Head Start providers face payment delays from the City, it leads not only to late and missing paychecks but also to the sudden closures of these facilities that New York families rely on. I'm grateful to see more streamlining of the procurement process in these ballot proposals.”
— Linda McPherson, President of Local 95 Head Start Employees

Local 205 Day Care Employees
July 23, 2026
“We applaud the Committee's ballot proposals to make the City's procurement and award process more efficient so that the workers who deliver these important services are no longer left in the dark about the security of their next paycheck.”
— Robert Ramos, President of Local 205 Day Care Employees

1digit
July 23, 2026
“Addressing late payments will keep the doors to community-serving organizations open for 3m New Yorkers who depend on them and will ensure that the workforce gets paid on time so they can take care of their own families. 1digit congratulates COGE on its important procurement recommendations”
— Jennifer Geiling, President of 1digit
Their position
Supports the procurement recommendations, citing late payments to community nonprofits. The figure of 3 million New Yorkers served is 1digit’s own.

Bronx Chamber of Commerce
July 23, 2026
“Bronx businesses know firsthand how valuable a more coordinated and predictable approach to permitting and City contracting can be”
— Lisa Sorin, President of the Bronx Chamber of Commerce

Win
July 23, 2026
“As the city’s largest provider of shelter for families, COGE's reforms will cut through the red tape that keep us from serving families faster, meaning we can focus on what we do best.”
— Christine C. Quinn, President & CEO of Win
Their position
Supports reducing nonprofit contracting red tape. Win describes itself as the city’s largest provider of shelter for families.
Staten Island Business Outreach Center & Forest Avenue BID
July 23, 2026
“Streamlining approvals for outdoor dining, accessibility ramps, benches, and sidewalk improvements, while modernizing City contracting, will help reduce costs, eliminate unnecessary red tape, and create greater opportunities for small businesses and nonprofit organizations.”
— Nina Flores, Executive Director of the Staten Island Business Outreach Center & Forest Avenue BID

Harlem Commonwealth Council
July 23, 2026
“Cutting contracting timelines from thirteen months to six returns that capital to its real purpose: building businesses, housing, and opportunity.”
— Sharon Joseph, CEO & President of Harlem Commonwealth Council
Their position
Supports faster nonprofit contracting. City Hall’s July 23 release credits the 13-to-6-month cut to internal reforms outside the Charter and estimates this proposal saves up to 30 days.

CitizensNYC
July 23, 2026
“Faster, fairer business approvals and contracting means small businesses and community-based nonprofits spend less time navigating City Hall and more time serving their neighborhoods. We commend the Commission for listening, and we're proud to support these changes.”
— Julie Shapiro, CEO of CitizensNYC

Tech:NYC
July 23, 2026
“We're excited to see Mayor Mamdani's Charter Revision Commission advancing practical reforms that modernize city government by reducing unnecessary bureaucracy, simplifying permitting, improving procurement, and helping government work more effectively”
— Julie Samuels, President and CEO of Tech:NYC

Vital City
July 23, 2026
“All that amounts to real improvement.”
— Vital City
Their position
Says all five proposals merit passage. On this question, calls the changes a real improvement but notes they leave out time limits for registering contracts and standards for paying vendors on time.