Gov

Justice of the Supreme Court

Christopher Chin

Christopher Chin

Democratic

Christopher Chin was elected to New York City Civil Court in 2021, served on Bronx Criminal Court, and is an Acting Justice of New York County Supreme Court.

Acting Supreme Court justice · Civil trials · Criminal proceedings

Selected cases & rulings

Civil trial & sexual-abuse claims

Presiding over a multi-plaintiff Adult Survivors Act trial

Adult Survivors Act trial · 2025

Presiding trial judge

Chin’s AABANY biography reports that he presided over a trial in which a jury awarded $1.68 billion to 40 plaintiffs.

What this tells you

An example of his experience overseeing a trial with many plaintiffs and claims involving events from decades earlier.

Read the AABANY biography ↗
Case context & history

The question: What experience does the candidate have managing a substantial civil jury trial?

Outcome / stage: Jury verdict reported

The biography identifies the trial as an Adult Survivors Act case involving acts from the 1990s and 2000s. It does not provide a docket citation or identify a particular ruling by Chin. The jury made the award. This is a trial-experience example, not a ruling by Chin on damages. Post-trial and appeal outcomes have not been established in this summary.

History coverage: Subsequent proceedings and appellate history have not been independently reviewed for this guide.

Criminal procedure & discovery

Invalidating a discovery certificate and dismissing on speedy-trial grounds

People v Davis · May 8, 2024

Authored the Bronx Criminal Court decision

Chin held the prosecution’s certificate of discovery compliance invalid because it omitted, among other things, civilian eyewitness names and contact information and did not show diligent efforts to obtain them.

What this tells you

The decision applies the discovery and speedy-trial statutes to the record before the court.

Read the official New York Courts Reporter opinion ↗
Case context & history

The question: When does incomplete discovery prevent the prosecution from claiming readiness for trial?

Outcome / stage: Motion granted; action dismissed on speedy-trial grounds after the court calculated 94 chargeable days.

The uncorrected, unreported decision concerns a Bronx criminal case against Shekara Davis. It is a trial-level procedural ruling, not a finding on the underlying assault or weapon allegations.

Subsequent history: A targeted search of the New York Courts Reporter and First Department filings located no subsequent appellate disposition for this matter as of September 12, 2026; nonpublic docket activity is not included.

Criminal procedure & suppression

Suppressing evidence after the People failed to establish probable cause

People v Chinga · April 29, 2024

Authored the Bronx Criminal Court decision

Chin found insufficient proof that Chinga was the vehicle operator or was intoxicated when the incident occurred, and suppressed the fruits of the unlawful arrest, including the chemical blood test, plus the noticed statements as specified in the order.

What this tells you

The opinion explains the probable-cause standard and the limits on using evidence obtained after an unsupported arrest.

Read the official New York Courts Reporter opinion ↗
Case context & history

The question: What proof is required to arrest a person at a hospital after a motor-vehicle incident?

Outcome / stage: Suppression motion granted in the stated respects.

The uncorrected, unreported decision is a pretrial suppression ruling in a Bronx criminal case; it does not decide guilt or innocence.

Subsequent history: A targeted search of the New York Courts Reporter and First Department filings located no subsequent appellate disposition for this matter as of September 12, 2026; nonpublic docket activity is not included.

Criminal procedure & probable cause

Suppressing identification evidence after an unsupported arrest

People v Cruz · December 13, 2023

Authored the Bronx Criminal Court decision

Chin found no probable cause for the arrest where the injured defendant left after being threatened and reported to police the next day; identification evidence obtained as the fruit of the arrest was suppressed, while noticed statements were not suppressed because the court found them voluntary.

What this tells you

The decision distinguishes the consequences of an unlawful arrest from the separate voluntariness analysis for statements.

Read the official New York Courts Reporter opinion ↗
Case context & history

The question: Did the record establish probable cause to arrest after a driver left an injury crash?

Outcome / stage: Motion granted in part; identification evidence suppressed and statements left admissible under the ruling.

The uncorrected, unreported decision is a pretrial suppression ruling; it does not determine the charged conduct at trial.

Subsequent history: A targeted search of the New York Courts Reporter and First Department filings located no subsequent appellate disposition for this matter as of September 12, 2026; nonpublic docket activity is not included.

These are selected examples, not a complete review or a rating. A jury verdict, a party's allegation, and a judge's ruling are distinct. The candidate's role is identified for each example, and one case does not establish an overall judicial philosophy.

Professional experience

  • The candidate materials report that, as a Bronx Criminal Court judge, he handled felony and misdemeanor arraignments, bench and jury trials, suppression hearings and opinions, including matters involving the then-new discovery laws.

    Read the candidate statement and resume ↗
  • The candidate materials describe prior state and federal litigation involving motor-vehicle, Labor Law, contractual indemnification, premises liability, asbestos liability, municipal liability and intentional torts.

    Read the candidate statement and resume ↗

Qualifications & evaluations

Previously reported out of a screening panel

Manhattan Democratic Party Independent Screening Panel · July 2026 release

The Manhattan Democratic Party's July 2026 screening release lists him among candidates reported out of an earlier independent Supreme Court screening panel; this is an attributed qualification record, separate from an endorsement.

Read the screening announcement ↗

Others running for Justice of the Supreme Court

Christopher Chin for Manhattan Supreme Court Justice (1st Judicial District) (2026) | By The People