General Election
New York CityProposal 1
Public-space permits
Changes how the City approves ramps, benches, cafés and other private uses of sidewalks and streets: public hearings become optional, and the City Council can no longer reject sidewalk cafés.
Endorsements & public statements
Who supports the proposal, who has raised concerns, and what they have said.
23 statements

Abundance New York
October 16, 2026
“If you are a fan of New York City’s outdoor dining, this amendment is an easy “yes.””
— Abundance New York
Their position
Recommends Yes. Says the change would save restaurants up to $1,800 and six months on outdoor-dining applications, and speed other street improvements such as ramps.
Common Cause New York
October 15, 2026
“Government efficiency is important, but it should not come at the expense of public participation and legislative oversight. Streamlining administrative processes should not mean removing meaningful opportunities for New Yorkers and their elected representatives to weigh in on decisions affecting public spaces.”
— Common Cause New York
Jews For Racial & Economic Justice
October 14, 2026
“JFREJ recommends voting yes on all five ballot measures.”
— Jews For Racial & Economic Justice

Citizens Union
October 1, 2026
“This is a straightforward, positive step to improve the outdoor dining culture that has greatly benefited our city.”
— Citizens Union
Their position
Says public hearings and Council call-up of individual sidewalk cafés would end, but other avenues for public input would remain.

Reinvent Albany
September 29, 2026
“We strongly support efforts to streamline the approval process for the City’s popular outdoor dining program. The ballot proposal smartly combines the revocable consent requirements for sidewalk cafés and roadway dining into a single application, making it easier for businesses to apply.”
— Reinvent Albany
Their position
Recommends a strong Yes. Supports combining the sidewalk-café and roadway-dining consents into a single application.

Citizens Budget Commission
October 20, 2026
Summary
Supports the proposal in its October analysis, according to amNY (Oct 20), arguing the current process is unnecessarily expensive and time-consuming while acknowledging concerns about reduced public input.
Center for Independence of the Disabled, New York
October 16, 2026
“creates a barrier to participation, particularly for low-income residents and people with sensory or digital access limitations. It also does not allow for valuable back-and-forth conversations with public officials.”
— Center for Independence of the Disabled, New York
Their position
Filed a statement opposing this proposal with the NYC Votes voter guide. Objects to ending required hearings and to removing Council review, saying Council members and community boards know street-level conditions in their neighborhoods best.
D9 Harlem Votes
October 16, 2026
Summary
Filed a statement opposing this proposal with the NYC Votes voter guide. NYC Votes says it opposed weakening existing layers of public oversight.
New York Lawyers for the Public Interest
October 16, 2026
“swift and efficient approval for these and other accessibility projects is an important step ensuring that millions of New Yorkers and visitors with disabilities can access housing, public space, and transportation.”
— New York Lawyers for the Public Interest
Their position
Filed a statement supporting this proposal with the NYC Votes voter guide, citing a backlog of applications for accessibility ramps, some of them for apartment buildings.
New York City Democratic Socialists of America
October 16, 2026
Summary
Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.
Municipal Art Society of New York
October 16, 2026
“we support the land use proposals in ballot questions #1, 2, and 4”
— Municipal Art Society of New York
Their position
Supports this proposal; recommends No only on Question 3. Also filed a supporting statement with the NYC Votes voter guide.
Regional Plan Association
October 16, 2026
Summary
Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.
New York City Hospitality Alliance
October 16, 2026
Summary
Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.
Long Island City Partnership
October 16, 2026
Summary
Listed by NYC Votes among the organizations that filed statements supporting this proposal.
League of Women Voters of the City of New York
September 16, 2026
“Removal of requiring newspaper advertising for public hearings may not be replaced with a method sufficient to notify the public.”
— League of Women Voters of the City of New York
Their position
Lists pros and cons without recommending a vote. The cons it lists: more sidewalk obstructions or lost parking, no specified replacement for newspaper notice, and Council members losing their power to call up sidewalk cafés for a vote.
New York City Council
July 24, 2026
“The Council is concerned by the speed and process through which the Administration advanced these Charter Revision Commission proposals”
— New York City Council spokesperson
Their position
A Council spokesperson said the commission advanced sweeping changes in weeks and that several proposals could reduce public input and weaken checks and balances. The statement covers the whole package and does not ask voters to reject any question.

Transportation Alternatives
July 23, 2026
“We're particularly excited about ballot proposals one and three, to speed up outdoor dining permitting and fast-track the installation of street infrastructure that will both save lives and save commuters a great deal of time.”
— Ben Furnas, Executive Director of Transportation Alternatives

Open Plans
July 23, 2026
“New Yorkers love outdoor dining, and our small businesses shouldn’t have to navigate an eight-month bureaucratic maze to make it happen”
— Sara Lind, Co-Executive Director of Open Plans
Their position
Supports streamlining outdoor-dining approvals. City Hall’s July 23 release puts today’s process at eight months and estimates about two months afterward; amNY reports that estimate also counts a separate Transportation Department effort to clear an application backlog.

NYS Latino Restaurant Association
July 23, 2026
“Making the permitting process more efficient allows restaurant owners to spend more time investing in their businesses and less time navigating paperwork”
— Sandra Jaquez, President of NYS Latino Restaurant Association

Third Avenue BID
July 23, 2026
“While all the ballot proposals are important, I am particularly thrilled to see proposals streamlining the approval process for pedestrian ramps, benches, and sidewalk cafés as well as modernizing city contracting to expand opportunities for small businesses and nonprofit organizations.”
— Pedro Suarez, Executive Director of Third Ave BID

Queens Economic Development Corporation
July 23, 2026
“The reforms proposed by COGE will do just that. These proposals will make it simpler to enjoy lunch outdoors on a sunny day, find an affordable place to live, and to cross the street safely.”
— Ben Guttmann, Executive Director of Queens Economic Development Corporation
Staten Island Business Outreach Center & Forest Avenue BID
July 23, 2026
“Streamlining approvals for outdoor dining, accessibility ramps, benches, and sidewalk improvements, while modernizing City contracting, will help reduce costs, eliminate unnecessary red tape, and create greater opportunities for small businesses and nonprofit organizations.”
— Nina Flores, Executive Director of the Staten Island Business Outreach Center & Forest Avenue BID

Vital City
July 23, 2026
“The first ballot measure helpfully proposes streamlining it — but stops short of moving outdoor dining onto standard permit footing, leaving restaurateurs with a bespoke arrangement they can’t fully count on.”
— Vital City
Their position
Says all five proposals merit passage. On this question, notes it streamlines approvals but stops short of putting outdoor dining on standard permit footing.